Journal rankings have negative impact
Björn Brembs, Katherine Button, and Marcus Munafò argue and provide facts in their paper “Deep Impact: Unintended consequences of journal…
1 is the Only Acceptable Acceptance Ratio
Thoughts on scientific conference procedures, based on ECRTS.
Björn Brembs, Katherine Button, and Marcus Munafò argue and provide facts in their paper “Deep Impact: Unintended consequences of journal…
Only because other conferences are doing it, you don’t have to – the benefit to your conference and its community…
Conferences are complex with breathtaking numbers of dependencies. Resolving a tiny symptom, with a possibly easy fix, can cause much…
… which is of course a bit of a polemic title, let me try to motivate: How can acceptance ratio…
I find numerical evaluation systems bad for the community. Evaluation criteria, notably h-index, are forced upon us by actors outside…
RTNS 24, The 32nd International Conference on Real-Time Networks and Systems, which has three deadlines over the year, with accept…
I believe paper length restriction are a historic artefact, needed to keep printing and shipping of proceedings low. It can…
Highlighting achievements is a good thing. The conference can signal which papers is considers very good, authors can take deserved…
Conference timing can have impact on time with families, quality of life, etc. At ECRTS, Sophie Quinton brought in changes…
Rules can be an important part of conference procedures. If made public, they contribute to transparency of conference procedures and…