1 is the only acceptable acceptance ratio
… which is of course a bit of a polemic title, let me try to motivate: How can acceptance ratio…
1 is the Only Acceptable Acceptance Ratio
Thoughts on scientific conference procedures, based on ECRTS.
… which is of course a bit of a polemic title, let me try to motivate: How can acceptance ratio…
I believe paper length restriction are a historic artefact, needed to keep printing and shipping of proceedings low. It can…
Highlighting achievements is a good thing. The conference can signal which papers is considers very good, authors can take deserved…
Conference timing can have impact on time with families, quality of life, etc. At ECRTS, Sophie Quinton brought in changes…
Rules can be an important part of conference procedures. If made public, they contribute to transparency of conference procedures and…
The evaluation process of conferences can be tricky and complex, quickly overwhelming if things go wrong (and some will). My…
… is one of the most important decisions for that year of the conference, and beyond that. Criteria should include:
I do appreciate the intention of rebuttals, improving the evaluation process, but am not convinced about the benefits vs. the…
Edward Lee posted on the Sigbed Blog “The Toxic Culture of Rejection in Computer Science” on negativity in CS conference…
Evaluation criteria are mostly of a one-fits-all type. I believe they should be different, based on the type of contribution,…